Gauhati HC to hear challenge to Assam’s pushback policy on July 22, ABMSU alleges illegal deportations

Guwahati, June 28: The Gauhati High Court on Friday took up a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the Assam government’s controversial pushback policy to deport suspected illegal immigrants without referring their cases to the Foreigners Tribunals.

The PIL, filed by the All BTC Minority Students Union (ABMSU), alleges that the state has been arbitrarily picking up individuals on mere suspicion and pushing them back across the border, bypassing legal procedures. A division bench comprising Justice Manish Choudhury and Justice Mitali Thakuria heard the matter and fixed July 22 as the next date of hearing.

ABMSU’s petition voices strong opposition to what it describes as years of harassment of genuine Indian citizens in the name of illegal immigration checks. The organization argued that the law mandates a clear process involving detection, detention, and adjudication by Foreigners Tribunals, and accused the government of violating these protocols.

advertisement

The union pointed out that the Supreme Court, in multiple orders, has stressed the importance of following due process in deportation cases. However, the petitioner claims that following the Supreme Court’s February 4, 2025 directive—ordering the deportation of 63 individuals declared foreigners—the state misinterpreted the ruling and began pushing back people not listed among the 63, including those whose citizenship status is still under legal consideration.

Senior advocate S. Hegde appeared for the petitioner virtually, assisted by advocate A.R. Bhuyan. Advocate General D. Saikia, assisted by Additional Advocate General B. Gogoi, represented the state.

Bhuyan informed the court that he had obtained a list of individuals subjected to the alleged pushback operations. He noted that while these individuals were earlier located on Indian soil, their current whereabouts are unknown. Bhuyan stated he would file an additional affidavit with the names and details of the affected persons by July 14.

On behalf of the state, Advocate General Saikia raised preliminary objections on the maintainability of the PIL.

The division bench scheduled the matter for further hearing on July 22, allowing time for both parties to file necessary submissions.

Hot this week

Pay hike of Assam ministers, MLAs likely as 3-member panel submits report

Full report likely by Oct 30 Guwahati Sept 25: There...

Meghalaya Biological Park Inaugurated After 25 Years: A New Chapter in Conservation and Education

Shillong, Nov 28: Though it took nearly 25 years...

Meghalaya man missing in Bangkok

Shillong, Jan 10: A 57-year-old Meghalaya resident, Mr. Treactchell...

ANSAM rejects Kuki’s separate administration demand, says bifurcation not acceptable

Guwahati, Sept 8: Rejecting the separate administration demand of...

Meghalaya’s historic fiber paves the way for eco-friendly products and sustainable livelihoods

By Roopak Goswami Shillong, Oct 25: From making earbuds to...

MoU with Assam: 5 villages to be brought under Meghalaya: Paul

Shillong, June 28: Five new villages will be brought...

PIL challenges system of issuing ST certificates

Shillong, June 28: The Meghalaya High Court on Friday...

Rain museum at Mawnsynram

Shillong, June 28: A rain museum will be built...

Cherry Blossom Festival bags gold awards

Shillong, June 28: Meghalaya’s biggest tourism festival, Shillong Cherry...

2 HNLC cadres surrender after 15 months with outfit

Shillong, June 28: Disillusioned with the proscribed HNLC’s stated...

Conrad Sangma hails strength of the youth in building their faith

North East Catholic Convention in Kohima unites thousands in...

Govt asks admin to ensure maintenance of status quo 

Resolving border dispute priority of both Meghalaya & Assam...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img