Hindu marriage not to be dissolved as contract: Allahabad HC

Prayagraj (UP), Sept 14: The Allahabad High Court, in a significant judgement, has ruled that a Hindu marriage is not to be dissolved or terminated as a contract.

The sacrament based Hindu marriage may be dissolved (in law), in limited circumstances and too only on the strength of evidence led by the parties, it said.

Allowing the appeal filed by a wife against dissolution of marriage, a division bench of justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Donadi Ramesh was of the view that even in “granting the divorce on the strength of mutual consent, the learned court below may have dissolved the marriage between the parties only in the event of that consent continuing to exist on the date of the order being passed”.

“Once the appellant claimed to have withdrawn her consent and that fact was on the record, it never became open to the learned court below to force the appellant to abide by the original consent given by her that too almost three years later,” the court said.

“To do that would be a travesty of justice,” the bench added.

The appeal was filed by the woman against a judgement passed by Additional district judge of Bulandshahar in 2011 allowing divorce petition (plaint) on behalf of her husband.

The two got married on February 2, 2006. At that time, the man was employed with the Indian Army. According to the plaint allegations, the woman deserted her husband in 2007. In 2008, the husband filed a petition for dissolution of marriage.

The wife filed her written statement and said she is living with her father. In mediation proceedings, the estranged couple expressed their view to live separately. However, during the pendency of the suit, the woman changed her view and contested the suit denying allegations made against her on which a second mediation was preferred but it also failed because her husband refused to keep her with him.

However, in mediation before Army authorities, they became ready to live with each other and two children also born in between.

Mahesh Sharma, appearing on behalf of the woman, had submitted before the court that all these documents and developments were brought before the court in divorce proceeding but the court in its order allowed the divorce petition only on basis of the first written statement filed on behalf of the woman which was challenged before high court. (PTI)

Hot this week

ANSAM rejects Kuki’s separate administration demand, says bifurcation not acceptable

Guwahati, Sept 8: Rejecting the separate administration demand of...

Speeding truck rams Tura night bus, 4 passengers injured

Tura, Sept 5: Four passengers onboard a night bus...

The Baghmara connection to Meghalaya’s political history

Tura, Aug 17: For many in the state, Baghmara...

Attacks on minorities in Bangladesh: Indian Chakmas call for export ban

CDFI blames ISI, Islamic terrorists for Bangladesh unrest Guwahati Sept...

Assam’s Rabha council chief ‘not a Rabha’

Boko, Sept 11: The Rabha Hasong Autonomous Council (RHAC)...

Raj Bhavan intervening in RG Kar impasse constitutionally: Guv

Kolkata, Oct 16: Alleging that the West Bengal government...

NEIGRIHMS gets new chemotherapy machine

Shillong, Oct 16: NEIGRIHMS on Wednesday inaugurated its newly...

SC to begin marital rape case hearing tomorrow

New Delhi, Oct 16: The Supreme Court will on...

Baba Siddique case, Shooters learnt to operate firearms through YouTube videos

Mumbai, Oct 16: Shooters involved in the killing of...

Nayab Saini to take oath as Haryana CM tomorrow

Chandigarh, Oct 16: Nayab Singh Saini will be sworn-in...

Vice-President launches major skill, entrepreneurial initiatives

₹60,000 cr earmarked for skilling 5 lakh youth in...

Arunachal Pradesh home to 36 snow leopards

Itanagar, Oct 16: Arunachal Pradesh is home to 36...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img