Mere breakup not enough for abetment to suicide: Delhi HC

New Delhi, Feb 25: Merely breaking up may not amount to instigation for a case of abetment of suicide under the criminal law, the Delhi High Court has said.

Justice Manoj Jain made the observation while dealing with a bail plea by a man accused of abetting the suicide of his former partner, who hanged herself five days after his marriage to another woman.

Granting bail to the accused, the court observed that the instigation should be of such a nature that leaves the deceased with no option but to commit suicide.

It said only a trial would establish whether the deceased’s “extreme step” was on account of provocation, instigation, “merely on account of her being hyper-sensitive girl” or for some other reason.

In the present case, the court noted, there was no dying declaration, and the parties were in a relationship for around eight years, during which there was no complaint from the deceased.

The court observed there was a considerable time gap between the date when the parties stopped talking and the date of the suicide.

“Apparently, it seems to be a case of a broken relationship and quite possibly, the deceased, having come to know that the applicant has got married to someone else, has chosen to finish herself,” the court said in the order passed on February 24.

“Though broken relationship and heartbreaks have become common these days, mere breaking-up of relationship may not per se constitute instigation so as to make it to be a case of abetment under Section 108 BNS (abetment of suicide),” the court order read.

According to the father of the deceased, his daughter had been trapped by the accused, who pressured her to convert to his religion for marriage, and it was under such pressure that his daughter committed suicide by hanging herself with a chunni in October 2025.

The accused was arrested in November 2025.

The court observed that, according to the woman’s friends, she was upset, and they never claimed anything on conversion. The accused had stopped talking to her from February 2025 onwards, it said.

According to the order, the man was let out on bail on a personal bond and surety bond of Rs 25,000 each.

The accused submitted that the parties were in a cordial relationship for around eight years, but the woman’s parents were against the relationship since they belonged to different religions.

He alleged that it was her parents who forced her to sever the relationship. (PTI)

Hot this week

Pay hike of Assam ministers, MLAs likely as 3-member panel submits report

Full report likely by Oct 30 Guwahati Sept 25: There...

Meghalaya Biological Park Inaugurated After 25 Years: A New Chapter in Conservation and Education

Shillong, Nov 28: Though it took nearly 25 years...

ANSAM rejects Kuki’s separate administration demand, says bifurcation not acceptable

Guwahati, Sept 8: Rejecting the separate administration demand of...

Meghalaya’s historic fiber paves the way for eco-friendly products and sustainable livelihoods

By Roopak Goswami Shillong, Oct 25: From making earbuds to...

Meghalaya man missing in Bangkok

Shillong, Jan 10: A 57-year-old Meghalaya resident, Mr. Treactchell...

Online trade license system under examination: KHADC

Shillong, June 18: The Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council...

Police launch new module to monitor investigation  

Forensic mobile vans deployed in all 12 districts: Tynsong   Shillong,...

Tynsong calls for change in mindset about laws

Shillong, June 18: It’s been nearly two years since...

Pradhan reviews preparedness for NEET-UG re-exam

New Delhi, June 18: Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan...

Delhi HC reserves verdict on Telegram ban

New Delhi, June 18: The Delhi High Court on...

SIR to begin in Meghalaya on June 20: CEO

Shillong, Jun 18: Meghalaya will undertake a state-wide Special...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories