He allegedly remained unaware of a text message sent by the school regarding a mandatory induction programme.
Shillong, May 28: Questions about functioning of elite schools in Meghalaya have been raised following a student’s family overlooking an “important” text message from a school authority and subsequent drastic action on the student.
The incident has drawn attention following a social media post by the student’s father Pushpinder Patel, a Central Government employee and also a YouTuber.
According to Patel, he has already moved the High Court against the Shillong-based school’s decision to remove his young son from the school rolls for missing an induction programme.
The already-viral video, where he narrated his family’s ordeal, has reignited a debate over whether some elite educational institutions have begun prioritising rigid procedures over compassion and humanity.
According to Patel, the admission process for his son the school began in June 2025, and the child secured admission on October 31, 2025 after clearing all interview rounds.
However, the situation allegedly took a traumatic turn in December when Patel’s wife suddenly fell critically ill and reportedly lost vision in one eye on December 8.
The family was forced into repeated hospital visits while simultaneously managing their hyperactive child.
During this period of crisis, Patel says, he remained unaware of a text message sent by the school on December 10 regarding a mandatory induction programme scheduled for December 13, as the notification had reportedly landed in his phone’s spam folder.
The family claims they realised the issue only after receiving a call from the school on the morning of the induction programme.
They immediately rushed to the campus, located near their residence, hoping to explain the circumstances.
What followed, according to the family, left them emotionally devastated.
“The principal was very angry and told us that we were not serious parents. I held my hands up and pleaded with him to let me show him the medical documents from the hospital where my wife was admitted but he didn’t listen,” Patel recalled emotionally.
The family alleges that while other children and parents attended the induction programme inside the campus, they were made to stand outside the school gates.
In one particularly painful moment, Patel alleged that when his son asked for refreshments after seeing other children receive them, the staff refused, saying they had strict instructions from the administration.
According to the family, the school refused them entry despite repeated appeals and requests for reconsideration.
The family says they subsequently attempted to resolve the matter amicably through written apologies, emails and by purchasing the required school uniforms.
However, Patel claims the school officially withdrew the child’s admission on February 10, 2026 – just a day before the new academic session was set to begin.
When Patel confronted the administration over the decision, he says he was met with defiance instead of empathy.
“He told me ‘shout more’, ‘no one can do anything to us’ and ‘do what you want’,” Patel alleged.
Left with no alternative, Patel moved the High Court.
According to the family, the legal battle proved emotionally and financially draining. The High Court subsequently directed the school to complete the child’s admission formalities within seven days.
Yet Patel claims the resistance did not end there.
“Sorry, sorry, go home. Talk to my lawyer, my lawyer will handle,” Patel alleged the Principal later told them.
The family says the prolonged ordeal left them deeply traumatised, with Patel’s wife breaking down outside the school gates following one such interaction.
Speaking to media, Patel said his struggle is no longer only about his son’s admission, but about a deeper crisis within the education system itself.
“Kindness, empathy, sympathy, and humanity are missing in our education system. If schools are churning out leaders without compassion, what will they be like with the public or their own staff? Education is meaningless if you don’t teach people to be kind to the poor and to society,” he said.
The controversy has since triggered wider conversations around the culture of elite schooling, administrative rigidity and whether educational institutions are placing procedure above the emotional well-being of children and parents.
At the time of filing this report, the school administration had not issued any public response regarding the allegations made by the family.
