If conversion is found illegal, couple cannot be recognised as married: Allahabad HC

Prayagraj, Sept 24: The Allahabad High Court has held that if conversion is illegal, a marriage based on it will be automatically invalid and the man and woman cannot be recognised as a married couple in the eyes of law.

Justice Saurabh Srivastava passed this order on a writ filed by Mohammad Bin Qasim alias Akbar seeking direction to the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful marital life.

The court, however, said that both the petitioners are entitled to perform marriage under the Special Marriage Act.

The petitioner’s counsel submitted said that Qasim belonged to Muslim community while Jainab Parveen alias Chandrakanta was Hindu. On February 22, 2025, Chandrakanta accepted Islam and Khanqahe Alia Arifia issued a certificate for this.

On May 26, 2025, both the petitioners solemnised their marriage as per rituals under the Muslim law and a marriage certificate was issued by the Quazi concerned, the counsel submitted.

However, the additional chief standing counsel vehemently opposed this on the ground that the conversion certificate allegedly issued by Khanqahe Alia Arifia is a forged and fictitious document, since the secretary and manager of Jamia Arifia, Saiyed Sarawan, Kaushambi stated in a reply that the institution has not issued the certificate on February 22.

On this, the court observed, “After hearing rival contentions raised by the learned counsel for the parties and perusal of the entire records, one thing is clear, that conversion on a forged document cannot determine any of the essential ingredients as mentioned in the Uttar Pradesh Unlawful Conversion Act.”

“Such, marriage solemnised between the petitioners is also not sustainable in the eyes of law since as per the Muslim Law, marriage is a contract between the follower and believer of the same religion. Once, the conversion in respect of Petitioner No 2 (Chandrakanta) is illegal, both the petitioners cannot be recognised as a married couple in the eyes of law,” it said.

However, the court directed both the petitioners to register their marriage under the Special Marriage Act, which does not require any ritual of conversion.

The court also directed that till the receiving of the certificate issued under the Special Marriage Act, Petitioner No 2 will be kept in a women’s protection home in Prayagraj, as she is not willing to reside with her parents and has expressed her consent to stay in the protection home.

The court, in its order on Tuesday, imposed an exemplary cost of Rs 25,000 on the counsel for petitioners, which shall be deposited in the Mediation and Conciliation Centre within 15 days from the date of order. (PTI)

Hot this week

Pay hike of Assam ministers, MLAs likely as 3-member panel submits report

Full report likely by Oct 30 Guwahati Sept 25: There...

Meghalaya Biological Park Inaugurated After 25 Years: A New Chapter in Conservation and Education

Shillong, Nov 28: Though it took nearly 25 years...

ANSAM rejects Kuki’s separate administration demand, says bifurcation not acceptable

Guwahati, Sept 8: Rejecting the separate administration demand of...

Meghalaya man missing in Bangkok

Shillong, Jan 10: A 57-year-old Meghalaya resident, Mr. Treactchell...

Meghalaya’s historic fiber paves the way for eco-friendly products and sustainable livelihoods

By Roopak Goswami Shillong, Oct 25: From making earbuds to...

When will you provide evidence to CID: Rahul to CEC on Aland vote ‘fraud’

New Delhi, Sept 24: Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on...

India ‘mostly with us,’ says Ukrainian President Zelenskyy

Washington, Sept 24: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said India...

SC bats for dedicated online portal to trace missing children

New Delhi, Sept 24: The Supreme Court on Wednesday...

Rajya Sabha polls for 4 J&K seats on Oct 24

New Delhi, Sept 24: Biennial elections to fill four...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories