Show some courtesy to court: SC on absence of Centre’s lawyers in suit filed by West Bengal govt

New Delhi, Feb 17: Show some courtesy to the court, the Supreme Court said on Monday while flagging that law officers or lawyers on behalf of the Centre were not present before it during the hearing of a suit filed by the West Bengal government.


A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Augustine George Masih expressed displeasure while observing that no law officer was present in the court when the matter was called for hearing.


A lawyer told the bench that Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who was to appear in the court in the matter, was arguing another case before a bench headed by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna.


“Somebody should be here. This is showing no courtesy to the court. There are so many law officers,” Justice Gavai said. “Show some courtesy to the court. It is a dispute between a state and the Union,” the judge said and pointed out that there are also many senior lawyers on the Centre’s panel.


The bench then passed over the matter on the request of the lawyer. Later in the day, when the solicitor general appeared in the court in some other matter, Justice Gavai told him, “Mr solicitor, in that West Bengal matter, nobody was present.

It cuts a very sorry picture that the Union is not interested in important matters. There are so many law officers, there are so many senior counsel on your panel and not a single lawyer was present.”


At the solicitor general’s request, the bench adjourned the matter for two weeks.
“Mr Tushar Mehta cannot be in every court. There are 17 courts,” Justice Gavai said in a lighter vein.


The West Bengal government has filed an original suit in the apex court against the Centre under Article 131 of the Constitution, alleging that the CBI has been filing FIRs and proceeding with its investigation, despite the state having withdrawn the general consent to the federal agency to probe cases within its territorial jurisdiction.


Article 131 deals with the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction in a dispute between the Centre and one or more states. In July last year, the top court had rejected the Centre’s objection to the lawsuit’s maintainability and listed the matter for framing of issues.


Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing in the matter for the West Bengal government, had argued that once the state had withdrawn its consent on November 16, 2018, the Centre could not allow the CBI to enter its territory for investigation. (PTI)

Hot this week

Meghalaya man missing in Bangkok

Shillong, Jan 10: A 57-year-old Meghalaya resident, Mr. Treactchell...

Pay hike of Assam ministers, MLAs likely as 3-member panel submits report

Full report likely by Oct 30 Guwahati Sept 25: There...

ANSAM rejects Kuki’s separate administration demand, says bifurcation not acceptable

Guwahati, Sept 8: Rejecting the separate administration demand of...

Meghalaya Biological Park Inaugurated After 25 Years: A New Chapter in Conservation and Education

Shillong, Nov 28: Though it took nearly 25 years...

Meghalaya’s historic fiber paves the way for eco-friendly products and sustainable livelihoods

By Roopak Goswami Shillong, Oct 25: From making earbuds to...

Avesh Khan stars in LSG’s 2-run win over RR

Jaipur, Apr 19: Pacer Avesh Khan held his nerve...

Netanyahu says Israel has ‘no choice’ but to continue fighting in Gaza

Deir Al-Balah, Gaza Strip, Apr 19: Israeli Prime Minister...

The educational genocide of our society: Mass extermination of educational prospects

By Dilip Mukerjea: Author and Innovative Learning Skills Specialist

NPP names office bearers of national committee

Shillong, Apr 19: The National People’s Party (NPP) in...

Motorsport spectacle in thrills audience at Laitkor

Shillong, Apr 19: High-energy motorsport captivated the audience during...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img