Plea on consumers ‘right to know’: SC grants six weeks to states, others to file responses

New Delhi, Aug 5: The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted six weeks time to several states and Union Territories to file their responses on a plea which sought to declare that consumers have a “right to know” about the quality, purity and certification of products, besides the details of distributors and sellers.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta was hearing a petition which said “right to know” was crucial for consumers to make informed choices and to protect themselves from unfair or restrictive trade practices and unscrupulous exploitation.

In July last year, the apex court had agreed to hear the plea and sought responses from the Centre, various states and UTs and others.

During the hearing on Wednesday, petitioner Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay told the bench that so far, he has received responses from only few states, including Haryana, Punjab, Bihar, Assam and the Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

“We grant six weeks time to the respondents who have not filed responses to file the same…,” the bench said.

It posted the matter for hearing after three months.

The plea, filed through advocate Ashwani Kumar Dubey, has also sought a direction to the Centre and states to ensure that every distributor, trader and shop owner displays details of registration, including name, address, phone number and number of employees at the entry gate in bold letters on a display board visible to people.

“Right to know helps consumers avoid falling prey to fraudulent or deceptive distributor, dealer, trader, seller and shop owner, who might misrepresent product/services or disappear after sale, purchase and money transaction,” it said.

The plea said if a consumer has an issue with a product or service, knowing details of the distributor, dealer, and seller is essential for filing a complaint and seeking redressal through consumer redressal forums.

It said in essence, the right to know empowers consumers to be informed or protected and to make choices when engaging in sale, purchase and money transactions.

“Each consumer has right to be informed about quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard, and price of goods and services to protect him against unfair trade practices,

restrictive trade practices and unscrupulous exploitation,” it said. (PTI)

Hot this week

Pay hike of Assam ministers, MLAs likely as 3-member panel submits report

Full report likely by Oct 30 Guwahati Sept 25: There...

Meghalaya Biological Park Inaugurated After 25 Years: A New Chapter in Conservation and Education

Shillong, Nov 28: Though it took nearly 25 years...

ANSAM rejects Kuki’s separate administration demand, says bifurcation not acceptable

Guwahati, Sept 8: Rejecting the separate administration demand of...

Meghalaya’s historic fiber paves the way for eco-friendly products and sustainable livelihoods

By Roopak Goswami Shillong, Oct 25: From making earbuds to...

Meghalaya man missing in Bangkok

Shillong, Jan 10: A 57-year-old Meghalaya resident, Mr. Treactchell...

Trump insists blockade gives US control of Strait of Hormuz

Washington, Aug 12: US President Donald Trump on Wednesday...

Jharkhand students’ protest over job exam ‘anomalies’ enters 20th day

Ranchi, Aug 13: The students’ protest over alleged irregularities...

Par panel flags nearly 73% students drop out before finishing higher secondary

New Delhi, Aug 12: A parliamentary panel has flagged...

Tranglaobi IED attack accused involved in 5 other firing cases: Manipur Police

Imphal, Aug 13: The accused arrested by the National...

HM assures UDP of looking into Meghalaya issues  

UDP raises FCRA, coal mining, ILP issues before Centre   Shillong,...

Govt to act on report on 108 service issues: Shylla

Shillong, Aug 12: Health Minister Wailadmiki Shylla has assured...

Elephant corridors shrink along Meghalaya-Assam border

The study found that 59 of 73 recorded elephant...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories